Koman Coulibaly who, according to Wikipedia, "is rumoured to hate the United States of America with the burning passion of a white hot sun."
This guy’s almost as bad as Kim Jong-Il.
The BBC 5 Live commentators mentioned several times that Coulibaly was on-field before the match with his video camera, “soaking up the atmosphere like a tourist”. I’d guess it likely that, in addition to having a history of being a grossly incompetent referee, Coulibaly was also paid to throw the match.
The Post knows how to appreciate a draw.
Ever since the group draw for the World Cup, I’ve been excited about being in the UK to watch the US play England. I assumed that in Scotland I would watch the match with a relatively friendly, England-hating crowd. Then I arrived at St Andrews and found that most of the classmates didn’t care much for football one way or another.
Coach Sweatpants: Bob Bradley
I watched the match in a crowd of Englishmen and international students who seemed to believe supporting England was rooting for the home team. Aberdeen-born US player Stuart Holden received a warm ovation and shouts of “SCOTLAND!” when he entered the pitch, but overall the crowd were behind England and lustily celebrated Gerrard’s fantastic goal in the fifth minute of the match. I was glad I had left my “Don’t Tread On Me” flag back in the flat.
After the match the US received warm applause for their efforts, though most seemed to take up the line of argument suggested by the BBC and ITV commentators: both sides were awful, with England playing a bit worse and the Yanks being a bit more lucky.
This is, of course, completely untrue. While England looked disorganized, the US defense worked wonders shutting down Wayne Rooney. Ricardo Clark continued to be weak for the US (we can thank him for Gerrard’s goal), but Donovan and Altidore stretched England down the field and Tim Howard was an absolute hero, playing out the last 65 minutes of the match with what are probably broken ribs. The Post is right to call the match a 1-1 victory; England were lucky we didn’t beat them.
The ITV and BBC commentators have generally been disappointing. They have little of substance to say and generally make their audience glad for the drone of the vuvuzelas. Maybe I’ve just been spoiled by Fernando Flores’s commentary on Univision.
During the US match, broadcaster ITV made some interesting decisions with their use of high-speed footage. Footage recorded at high-speed records greater definition of movement; however, when played at regular speed it renders all movements in dreamy slow motion. While we were treated to the requisite (and, as always, beautiful) shots of the spin on a bending football and how Tim Howard’s body crumpled when he was spiked on a contested ball, ITV frequently chose to show us high-speed footage of the coaches. Watching a very well defined Bob Bradley think about what tracksuit he’ll wear for the next match is anything but riveting television.
These high detail shots of the bench did provide for moments of merriment. After US twelfth man Robert Green gifted the Nats a goal, we were treated to a good seven seconds of David Beckham ruminating in high-speed slow-motion:
Becks disapproves.
There was a rousing jeer from the Scots and Americans in the audience, and the gratuitous length of the shot even inspired the England fans to laugh through their pain.
It’s unlikely that the ITV programmers have been inspired by Gogol and intended to evoke laughter through tears. The evening was full of poor choices by ITV; seconds before England scored the opening goal, ITV cut away from the game to a Hyundai advertisement in which cars play football, returning to the match just in time for the player celebrations. (Video here.)
